<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Which October Release are you most looking forward to?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/1.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Which October Release are you most looking forward to?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[  Defintley Seeing
 The Heartbreak Kid
  Gone Baby Gone
  Proably See
  The Comebacks
  Run,Fatboy Run 
  Might See
  We Own The Night
  30 Days Of Night
  Reservation Road
  Saw IV
  Dan In Real Life
    No Chance In Hell
     The Seeker:The Dark Is Rising
      Micheal Clayton      
       Elizabeth:The Golden Age
       Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5269</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5269</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:36:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Definitely:
Saw IV
Michael Clayton

Probably:
Rendition
The Seeker: The Dark is Rising
30 Days of Night

Maybe:
The Heartbreak Kid
Martian Child
Gone, Baby, Gone
Reservation Road
We Own the Night

I also might eventually see limited releases Grace is Gone, Finishing the Game, and/or Sleuth.

Doubtful:
Run, Fat Boy, Run
Things We Lost in the Fire
Dan in Real Life

No Way, Jose:
The Comebacks
Elizabeth: The Golden Age
Rogue
TP's Why Did I Get Married
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5271</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5271</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:49:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Shryke42]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I want to see Michael Clayton and/or The Comebacks]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5272</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5272</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:52:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ iamhollywood]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think I have heard a little about The Seeker, and from what I understand, it is a successful book series.  But for a movie, the title isn't doing it any favors.  You think a studio would have tried to streamline the title a little better for the mass film audience.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5279</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5279</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:35:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jameydunne]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Definite

Heartbreak
Michael Clayton
30 Days
Saw 4 (obligation)
Rendition

Probable

We Own
Comebacks
Run Fatboy
Dan
Gone Baby

Not Interested

Seeker
Reservation
Elizabeth
Tyler Perry

]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5285</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5285</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:42:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ JackO]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5290</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5290</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:50:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Gone Baby Gone !!!!!!
The word of mouth is excellent. Can't wait.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5291</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5291</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 04:23:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Chienfantome]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>Chienfantome wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote>Gone Baby Gone !!!!!!
The word of mouth is excellent. Can't wait.&nbsp;
		</blockquote>

Saw a preview for it this weekend before Death Sentence - it looks exceptional.

Here are my picks:
Will see-
Run Fatboy Run
Dan In Real Life
Gone Baby Gone
30 Days of Night
Things We Lost in the Fire 
Might see-
Elizabeth
Michael Clayton
The Comebacks
Saw IV]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5298</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5298</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 06:58:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ becs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I have no desire to see Tyler Perry's..., but on a mogul's thought, it may be worth picking up if the price is right.  His movies tend to do good box office wise, and with him bringing Madea back on the screen, this might end up being a sleeper on a straight BO league.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5301</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5301</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:47:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jameydunne]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you take the Tyler Perry movie you'll get some nice box office and  maybe crack the top 5 but beware the iMDb -- these movies seem to get disproportionately low scores so you'll almost certainly be taking a hit.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5304</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5304</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:16:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ A_Roode]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There's no Madea in this one, actually. Not 'til Tyler Perry's NEXT film.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5305</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5305</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:35:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dranscht]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5311</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5311</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 01:19:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>tuan69 wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote><b>Breaking News:
</b>
Tyler Perry has driven off a cliff on a Mexican highway.

No, only joking, if only.&nbsp;
		</blockquote>


If Only]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5325</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5325</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:01:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Im going to see Heartbreak Kid just because Ben Stiller is in it and i want to see how he does full gray.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5330</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5330</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 19:54:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ iamhollywood]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5332</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5332</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 20:28:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ i think rogue is gonna be a big suprise...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5335</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5335</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 21:40:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nickb1016]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Rendition looks good.  Am I missing something...no one appears to want to see it. :shock: ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5347</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5347</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:00:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lovely]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I want to see it... not only because I love Reese Witherspoon as an actress but because I like the way it shines a big fat spotlight on the other side of racial profiling. 

It's just not at the very top of my list, that's all.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5353</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5353</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 11:45:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Shryke42]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Why is everyone so excited about 30 Days Of Night it looks alright but nothing that special.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5359</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5359</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:43:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Definitely Seeing:
The Heartbreak Kid
Lars and the Real Girl
30 Days of Night
Run, Fatboy, Run
Saw IV (shamefully :oops:<b></b>)
Dan In Real Life (again, shamefully)
Things We Lost in the Fire
Funny Games

Definitely Not Seeing:
The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising
Elizabeth: The Golden Age
Postal
The Comebacks
Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married
Sleuth
Sarah Landon and the Paranormal Hour 

The rest I could go either way on, or don't know of

]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5363</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5363</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:33:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bobbin3000]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think everyone knows what I'm looking forward to.  Saw IV.  The dark is rising definatley looks better and better the more I see of it.
I think they should've taken half the movies from october and put them in september.  cause this month definatley needs some better movies.
Movies not looking forward too.  Mainly just the tyler perry movie.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5425</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5425</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:17:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cRAzY]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I can't wait to see "We Own The Night."  Joaquin is always great, and this film looks like it will be awesome!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5695</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5695</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:05:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tubular]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ October looks like crap.

I'm only really looking forward to "Dan in Real Life" and "Lars and The Real Girl"

Love Steve Carell. and Ryan Gosling

]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5699</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5699</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:33:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ lillylovelost]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>lillylovelost wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote>October looks like crap.

I'm only really looking forward to "Dan in Real Life" and "Lars and The Real Girl"

Love Steve Carell. and Ryan Gosling

&nbsp;
		</blockquote>


October is actually alright November sucks
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5700</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5700</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:11:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>transformers2 wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote>
October is actually alright November sucks
&nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Gonna have to disagree with you there; November holds American Gangster, Lions For Lambs, and Hitman... plus Bee Movie, Fred Claus, and Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium for the families (not to mention Enchanted), and of course Beowulf, which I'll definitely see if we get it in 3D.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5705</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5705</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:29:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dranscht]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I want to see most of those.  Besides bee movie of course.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5711</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5711</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:35:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cRAzY]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The only November films that interest me are Amercian Gangster, Hitman and Beowulf. All the others i will proably pass on.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5718</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5718</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:10:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ My take on <b>the first week in <u>October</b></u>:   


<i>The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford </i>won't be a mainstream hit.  It can't be; it's too contemplative, too cerebral, too ambiguous, too beautiful.  The best it can hope for, revenue-wise, is to win over some influential critics and nab some Oscar nominations.  Fortunately, it looks poised to do just that.  It still won't earn $100M, not even if it plays through April.  (Even <i>Unforgiven </i>barely made that, and even the best-made Western doesn't have the drawing power that even the most anemic, self-referencing, endlessly derivative <i>Star Trek </i>installment commands.)  Perhaps they should have called it <i>The Assassination of Jesse James by Noel <b>Coward</b>, <b>Robert </b>Redford and Harrison <b>Ford</b></i>; now, <u><b>THAT</b></u> would have packed 'em in, and no one would notice the difference.  <i>Expanding 10/5</i>

<i>The Darjeeling Limited </i>reminds me of <i>Catch Me If You Can </i>by way of <i>Into the Wild</i>, <i>Legends of the Fall</i> and <i>The Razor's Edge</i>.   (Hey, someone must have agreed with me at some point, Bill Murray's in it!)  I've wanted to see this film since the very first thirty seconds I was aware of it.  <i>Darjeeling </i>could earn <i>Rushmore</i>-sized acclaim.  (Hey, Bill Murray!)  Rejected titles:  <i>A Passage to India's F#@%-You-In-the-Ass Prison</i>; <i>Seven Years in a Tibetan Jail</i>; <i>The Mandatory Life Sentence with Steve Zissou</i>.  (Murray!)  <i>Expanding 10/5</i>

<i>December Boys</i>, otherwise known as <i>Harry Potter and the Purple Staff of Manhood</i>, has that same vaguely icky, discomfiting borderline-child-pornography feel that certain elements of <i>Taxi Driver</i>, <i>Interview with the Vampire</i>, <i>Leon (The Professional)</i> and pretty much any straight-to-DVD release featuring Alyssa Milano has.  There's just something... <b><i><u>NYUUUHHHHHHHH</u>!!!</i></b>... about watching child stars grow up to get clumsily, messily deflowered onscreen.  Therefore, I predict <i>December Boys </i>will open to massive acclaim and high PTA.  Oh, and it'll probably be a decent movie, too.  <i>Expanding 10/5</i>

<i>Feel the Noise </i>is also coming out.  And, um, that's all I have to say about that.  <i>Opens 10/5 [Limited]</i>

<i>Finishing the Game </i>looks intriguing -- I have to admit, like most aging dorks, I have a soft spot for Bruce Lee and the entire genre of Asian martial-arts action movies -- but I doubt I'll see it before it's on IFC.  <i>Opens 10/5 [Limited]</i>

<i>The Good Night</i> has a great cast (including fanboy fave Simon Pegg), but, really, this is just pretentious, artsy-fartsy crap.  I love it when novice Hollywood directors have the temerity to pretend they're the first people to ever think of things, like (in this case) how dreams, being phantasmal and ungrounded, are disconnected from the burdens of real-world consequences and are therefore often misleading.  How profound.   (More and more, the good citizens of La-La-Land remind me of Charlie, the astonishingly thick, disingenuous, self-impressed ex-gf from <i>High Fidelity</i>.)  Somewhere, Sigmund Freud is groaning and wishing he could still self-medicate himself into stupefied oblivion, if only to escape the little-brains he tragically shares some measure of DNA with.  There's a reason they're called, the <u><i><b>GRATEFUL</b></i></u> dead, folks, there really is.  Life is wasted on many of the living. <i> Opens 10/5 [Limited]</i>

<i>The Heartbreak Kid</i>:  I think I'm just about over Ben Stiller, seriously I am.  I used to like the guy, but the half-life of the appeal of goofy comedies -- other than the classics, like <i>Caddyshack </i>or <i>Young Frankenstein </i>-- has always been shorter for me than, say, of historical war films, and I've just seen the guy in too many similar roles to get excited about yet another "zany Ben Stiller" movie, y'know?  This guy hit his pinnacle with <i>Meet the Parents</i>, and now he's well into a full-blown career flameout (it's awfully interesting, to me, that he chose to do <i>Night at the Museum </i>at about the same point in <u><i>his</i></u> career, as Robin Williams signed on for <i>Jumanji </i>in his own).  Besides, the title, one of the worst ever, sounds like it should star Matt Dillon or Corey Haim -- twenty years ago.  I won't allow my heart to be broken by the former <i>Seven Day Itch</i>; I won't care enough to see it at all.  <i>Opens 10/5 [Wide]</i>

What is this, The Year of Reading Femininely?  <i>The Jane Austen Book Club </i>sounds like the sort of feature Oprah would make with one of the Ephron sistas.  (The one who isn't married and has eighteen cats named 'Mister Fluffles,' probably.)  Well, at least it has Maria Bello, which means there ought to be at least five full minutes my TiVo remote isn't on triple-fast-forward.  Perhaps they should have called it, <i>How to Make an American Bored</i>, or <i>Divine Secrets of the Yawn-Yawn Sisterhood</i>.  <i>Expanding 10/5</i>

I've been looking forward to the "controversial" -- an overused bit of hyperbole, but one that might just be warranted in this case -- documentary <i>Lake of Fire </i>for quite awhile, now, if only for the fact that this <u><i>appears</i></u> to be a documentary made by someone who isn't merely trying to engage in propaganda for either side.  (Hey, remember when documentaries were investigations of an elusive "truth," and not merely commercials for a partisan cause?)  You could almost consider Tony Kaye's (director of the equally astonishing <i>American History X</i>) latest a "retro" film, which should make <u><i><b>all</b></i></u> serious fans of this now-trendy genre queasy...  I love film that dares to ask tough questions and then, even more daring, er, -ly, obstinately refuses to give its audience pat, feel-good answers.  Sometimes I wonder if I'm really an American. Plus, it sounds like a Johnny Cash song, or a post-apocalyptic epic starring Christian Bale and Matthew McConaughey.<i> Opens 10/5 [Limited]</i>  

I hate myself, I really do, for loving George Clooney so very, very much.  Even his bad films are much improved, just by his presence; he's got this indefinable, gender-nonspecific charisma that combines the brooding, coy machismo of James Dean with the intelligence, world-weariness and <i>gravitas </i>of Anthony Hopkins.  He makes films that are thoughtful and articulate, and that I admire even when I don't agree with them, ideologically.  So, of course, I'm looking forward extremely to <i>Michael Clayton</i>, which reminds me of what might happen if Stephen Soderbergh combined <i>The Insider </i>with <i>The Firm</i>.  <i>Opens 10/5 [Limited]</i>

<i>My Kid Could Paint That </i>might well have been titled, <i>John Stossel Could Have Made This</i>.  Seriously, what's the draw?  This "investigation" of how a four-year-old's finger paintings became an Internet and art-world sensation through gimiickly marketing and massive gullibility has the same sort of "Dog Bites Man" flavor as half of my morning newspaper, and fully ninety percent of the daily content of <i><u>Countdown with Keith Olbermann</u></i>.  So, rich snobs think they're smart, and end up being dumber and more naive than the rest of us poor, huddled masses with our American Excess Tin cards.  (Rejected as a Member since 2001!)  This should have been a <u><i>Dateline NBC </i></u>'expose'.  Opens 10/5 [Limited]

I just can't get motivated for <i>The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising</i>; love the theme, the effects look decent, and we haven't seen a really <i>well-made </i>adventure / hero-quest film since <i>The Lord of the Rings</i> wrapped up (<i>Terabithia </i>was, I thought, disappointing)...  I love Christopher Eccleston and, of course, Ian McShane, but unless it earns great-to-phenomenal reviews, I won't 'seek' this one out before PPV, and perhaps not even then.  (It's just possible that Peter Jackson spoiled me for <u><i><b>any</b></i></u> of these films, for all time; I went, <i><b>Meh</b></i> to <i>Narnia</i>, <i>Terabithia</i>, <i>Stardust</i>, <i>Golden Compass </i>and, of course, <i>Eragon</i>, too...  I mean, once you've eaten filet mignon, minute steak -- or even top sirloin -- just ain't so appetizing, y'know?)  <i>Opens 10/5 [Wide]</i>

The fact that <i>Weirdsville </i>won an award from the Director's Guild of Canada, perhaps, explains why Hollywood, and not, oh, Vancouver, is the thick, rich, nougat-y center of the entertainment universe.  This would have been an awesome film-of-the-week on SciFi or USA, though, oddly enough, it would probably have lowered the cumulative I.Q. of the first, and doubled that of the second.  I'll await its premiere on IFC.  Never, ever, but never trust the cultural compass of a nation that puts waterfowl and beavers on its currency, is my motto... or it would be, if I had a motto.   <i>Opens 10/5 [Limited]</i>


Until next time, I lay down my enchanted quill...  I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5720</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5720</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:36:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5733</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5733</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:13:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You cryed though terabithia.  Sorry,  Call me heartless, but I saw it coming.  They didn't build very well on it.  Alpha Dog was sadder to me.  Probably because it was based on a true story and Terabithia was just fantasy.  But hey.  Whatever's your preference.  Im not gonna judge it.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5771</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5771</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:43:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cRAzY]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ oh yeah.  Back to original topic.  Heatbreak looks funny to me.  Kind of like Mary Something.  But possibly better.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5773</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5773</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:46:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cRAzY]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I really do want to see We Own the Night, although I think it would have done better had it been titled The Departed2, but it looks good on its own none the less.
I can't wait for The Kingdom...to bomb.
I think The Heartbreak kid could possibly revive the Farrelly brothers as well as make Ben Stiller re-appeal to older audiences.
The Michael Clayton kind of confused me as to what it's really about, so i'll wait to rent it.
30 days of night looks like it'll be really cool, but it's probably gonna be style over substance, but who cares.
Gone, Baby, Gone looks very promising...glad to see Ben Affleck back on his way up. And even more glad to see Casey finally get the roles he deserves.
Dan in real life actually looks pretty good. Hopefully Steve Carrell's fans will forgive him for Evan Almighty. And Hopefully Dane Cook's fans will forgive him for pretty much every movie he's made so far.
At first, I thought "oh, great. another Elizabeth movie." After seeing the trailer though, Holy crap! does it look awesome. I'm not too big on movies about played out historical figures, but i might actually see The Golden Age in theatres.
Yay, The Comebacks can finally walk right into the door that i'm going to be slamming in it's face. I will also yell "DON'T COMEBACK!" ha.
The Seeker: The Dark is Rising looks like it should have come out in the early nineties. If it had, Harry Potter wouldn't be as popular, and maybe i would have actually gone and seen it. When i was 7.
Tyler Perry sucks.
I'm going to see Saw4, strictly because it is Saw4. Because the trailer actually makes it look really bad. Even the trailer for Saw2(which is probably one of the worst movies ever made) made it look pretty cool.
At the beginning of the trailer, Rendition looked alright, but halfway through...why can't Peter Sarsgaard get roles in GOOD movies. I refuse to believe that Shattered Glass was the peak of his career. Give him some leads already.
Reservation Road looks very good, although it will probably end up being a forgettable family drama, nothing special enough to make me believe that Mark Ruffalo can act.


]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5780</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5780</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:57:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ StnMan5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oh my GOD! I can't believe i almost forgot!
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead is going to be hands down one of the best movies in years. With the direction of Sidney Lumet (I forgive him for the Wiz) the absolute brilliance of Philip Seymour Hoffman, and a surprisingly vulnerable Ethan Hawke, all rolled into one crime/family drama that explores desperation and betrayal as well as loyalty and good old family values, how could you possibly not go for this movie. It will be the best movie of the year. And if it isn't, then The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford will be. Wasn't that movie supposed to come out like two years ago? either way, I'm stoked for it!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5781</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5781</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:25:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ StnMan5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I guess I'd consider these good Peter Sarsgaard movies:

Flightplan (not so much that the movie was good, but his role was)
Garden State
Kinsey]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5785</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5785</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:12:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dranscht]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I loved Garden State, and Kinsey was very good. I've yet to see Flightplan...I don't know if I will...But what I mean is he's better than the roles he gets. It's time to let him carry a movie. Jarhead, Garden State, and Shattered Glass prove that he's one of the best actors around right now and he just doesn't get enough roles. I want more Peter Sarsgaard!
That's all I'm saying.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5790</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5790</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:58:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ StnMan5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b>StnMan5</b>, I argued with you enough earlier, in <i>The Kingdom </i>thread [grin], so for now I'll just stick to what I really, really <u><i>agree</i></u> with you on, or at least find intriguing...


You make an excellent point, I think, about <i>We Own the Night</i>.  I see this film only performing so-so ($35-$40M) and I doubt the critics will be very impressed.

P.S.  I know Scorcese has <i>mentioned</i> a sequel for <i>Departed</i>, but does anyone else wonder,  [<b>spoiler </b>-- swipe to read] <font color='white'>just who the Hell would star in it?  I mean, I get Mark Wahlberg (SSgt. Dignam) and, I suppose, Alec Baldwin ( Capt.  Ellerby)...  but who the f@%# else is LEFT?  The police shrink Sullivan (and Juniuh) was banging?   "That idiot cop magnet of a cousin," Sean?   Mrs. Kennefick?  The Realtor?</font>  Okay, I'm done now.


I think it's fair to say that the "reservations" (putting it mildly, there, I suspect) <u><i>YOU</i></u> have about <i>The Kingdom</i>, are pretty much on-par with the ones <u><i><b>I</b></i></u> have regarding <i>The Heartbreak Kid</i>.  There's just no easy, polite way for me to say this:  <b>Ben Stiller </b>simply doesn't interest me anymore.  (Neither do <b>Robin Williams</b> or <b>Mike Myers </b>or <b>Will Ferrell</b>, frankly, and <b>Jack Black</b>'s shooting up the list pretty darned quick, too.  So is <b>Christopher Walken </b>-- oh, this hurts! -- and I friggin' <u><i><b>NEVER</b></i></u> thought I'd say <b><u>THAT</u></b>!!!)  I've been wrong before, betting against The Farrelly Brothers, so perhaps I'm talking out my ass here...  But, as a paying customer, I've pretty much washed my hands of all of 'em.  (That is, until they go back to doing intriguing work in films like -- but not <u><i><b>TOO</b></i></u> like -- <i>Your Friends & Neighbors</i>, or <i>One Hour Photo</i>, or <i>So I Married An Axe Murderer</i>, or <i>Stranger Than Fiction</i>, or <i>High Fidelity</i>.  I mean, if <b>Luke Wilson </b>can redeem <u>himself</u>, with only a bit part -- in <i>3:10 to Yuma </i>-- surely <u><b>they</b></u> can...  right?)


I'm very, very intrigued by <i>Michael Clayton</i>, but I doubt this film will find an audience, unless some serious Oscar buzz starts, erm, buzzing.

 
I hope you're wrong, but suspect you're dead-center right, about <i>30 Days Of Night</i>.   Then again, I never saw <i>Night Watch </i>coming, either.  Or, for that matter, <i>28 Days Later</i>.  <b><u><i>OR</i></u></b> <i>Eastern Promises </i>(which needs to be nominated for Best Picture in my opinion, and quite a few more categories, besides).  


I am extremely excited to see <i>Gone, Baby, Gone</i>, as well as <i>No Country for Old Men</i>.  I'd like to see <b>Affleck </b>take the next step, too; I suspect he'll be a far, far better director, than an actor.  (And he's already proven he can write.)   And <b>Casey</b>'s been <b>Joaquin Phoenix </b>to Ben's <b>River </b>for far too long, in my opinion.  We're agreed.



I might just be the worst person, ever, to consult about <b>Steve Carrell</b>'s prospects -- I thought <i>The 40 Year Old Virgin </i>would flop, and that <i>Evan Almighty </i>would flirt with $200M.  But I think <i>Dan in Real Life</i> might <u><i>just</i></u> be the sleeper hit of the Fall.  (Then again, I was flat-out <u><b>convinced</b></u> that <i>Wild Hogs </i>would bomb, and that <i>Rescue Dawn </i>would be a modest hit, and -- perhaps, most infamously -- that <i>Aqua Teen HUnger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters</i> would reach nigh-blockbuster heights.  Consider the source.)


<blockquote>Hopefully Dane Cook's fans will forgive him for pretty much every movie he's made so far. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Dude...  priceless.  Props.  You reminded me of, well, me, there.


I have high <u><b>HOPES</b></u> for <i>Elizabeth: The Golden Age</i>... but, here, I'm about to ruin my street-running-in-front-of-the-art-house cred, because -- although I <u><i><b>like</b></i></u> <i>Elizabeth </i>very, very, <i><b>very </b></i>much -- it was fantastically overrated, and people don't seem to remember just how mediocre a period film it really was.  

Don't get me wrong.  <b>Cate Blanchett</b>'s performance was <u><i><b>stunning</b></i></u>, <b>Geoffrey Rush</b>'s mesmerizing; and there were many, many things to admire -- set design most especially, but also makeup (for which it won the Academy Award), costuming, and even the film's period digital effects -- but <i>Elizabeth</i>, though not in actuality a Miramax production, represents to me the very embodiment of that noxious temerity, that puffed-up pretentiousness, that overzealous, overambitious, nigh-hysterical over-reaching that became so familiar to observers of that studio under the Brothers W (I mean, come, now, let's be honest: <i>Amélie </i>was about as deserving of its five Oscar nominations, as<i> Cold Mountain </i>-- another Miramax effort, surprise -- was of its <u>seven</u>, and, man, that ain't saying much).  A fractured story, with incredibly inconsistent performances -- <b>Richard Attenborough </b>looks positively horrified he ended up in such a mess; <b>Joseph Fiennes</b> seems forever in the process of passing a kidney stone, in the midst of a "romantic" performance just this side of <b>Hayden Christensen</b>'s in <i>Attack of the Clones </i>["Padme, oh, my Padme, my love for you hurts so much, I wish my major intestine would leap straight up through my neck and throttle my brain..."]; and even the venerable <b>John Gielgud </b>appears to be praying for impending death, a bequest that appears to have been, ultimately, granted -- and a mere cursory understanding of the age's complex international and sezual politics, <i>Elizabeth </i>is a "period piece" more properly befitting a question mark; it's <i>Shakespeare in Love </i>(another unforgivably overappreciated title) writ only slightly larger, this time in pen instead of crayon, but still only in a primary-school composition book.

But, as I said, I have <u><i><b>HOPE</b></i></u> that <i>Elizabeth</i>'s sequel will be decent, and not merely <i>Elizabeth II: The Wrath of Queen</i>, as directed by Roland Emmerich.  Although it looks at first glance as if they lifted the naval engagements straight out of, if not <i>Pirates of the Carribean: At World's End</i>, then certainly <i>The Patriot</i>.  Truly, God save the Queen.  

       
I quite agree with you about <i>The Seeker: The Dark is Rising</i>.  Too little.  Too late.  Too bad.


I actually think Ruffalo <u><i><b>can</b></i></u> act, but I have my concerns about <i>Reservation Road</i>, too.  I am having difficulty seeing what audience could possibly embrace this film... perhaps, support-group patrons?   (I'm really not trying to be insensitive here; this is going to be a difficult film, not that great a date night movie, you know?)  It's too bad; I'lm really, really counting on this film in at least one of my leagues.


 
I came late to the realization that <i>Before the Devil Knows You're Dead </i>could be one of the season's best films; I think you're on the right track, here, though as far as the Ultimate Moguls game goes, I don't think I can recommend it.  (And Box Office Moguls is right out.)


I think <i>The Ass. of Jesse James </i>(I tried <i>Jesse James's Ass.</i>, but, you know, it didn't roll quite so trippingly off the tongue) will contain some of the best visuals of the year, and will positively enthrall audiences and critics alike.  Folks may even come back for a second look.  ...Stop laughing.

 
  
Ooooh...  <u>RE</u>:  <b>Peter Sarsgaard</b>, [1] <i>Jarhead </i>(hate the film, <u><b>love</b></u> the performance; [2] <i>Shattered Glass</i>; [3] <i>Kinsey</i>; [4] <i>Garden State</i>; [5] <i>Boys Don't Cry </i>(no one ever remembers that one!).  And, please, let's not forget <i>K-19: The Widowmaker</i>, either...  The kid's a talent, no question.  Plus, he reminds me soooooo much of a young <b>John Malkovich</b>, by way of <b>Marlon Brando</b>...


I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5793</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5793</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:20:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5795</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5795</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:55:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nico,
Your Departed spoiler was hilarious. I guess I never even thought of that.  I have to tell you that I agree with pretty much everything you said...I guess we'll just have to stay away from discussions about The Kingdom is all.  Because, I haven't seen it so I shouldn't harshly judge it the way I have been, but if you could see the way the trailer looks when I look at it,(you ever see that video of the woman being mauled  by that  bear on that french tv show?) you would understand why i'm so reticent about it.

Also, I thought I was the only one getting weary of Christopher Walken. He's a great actor, sometimes. But didn't he die like three years ago. How is he still around? The only thing worse than recent Christopher Walken is people trying to do Christopher Walken Impersonations.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5800</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5800</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:52:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ StnMan5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>you ever see that video of the woman being mauled by that bear on that french tv show?&nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Please, God, let it be <b>Britney Spears</b>...  Now, if <u><i><b>that</b></i></u> had been the subject / victim / <i>hors d’œuvre </i>served in <i>Grizzly Man</i>, I'd have actually <u><i><b>PAID</b></i></u> to see it!

<i>Nyush, nyun, nyunch</i>...  "Mmm, Zoidberg <u><i><b>LOVE</b></i></u> movie star on smack!"  <i>Gnosh, gnyum, gnutch</i>...


<blockquote>I thought I was the only one getting weary of <b>Christopher Walken</b>. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Dude, I bet even <b><u>Christopher Walken</u></b>'s getting weary of <b>Christopher Walken</b>.  The man is, officially, more caricature than character...


<blockquote>He's a great actor, sometimes. But didn't he die like three years ago. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
This is soooo friggin' funny.


<blockquote>The only thing worse than recent Christopher Walken is people trying to do Christopher Walken Impersonations.&nbsp;
		</blockquote> 
I dunno, some of 'em are far more convincing than the real thing, these days...


<i>I am so not getting any sleep tonight.  </i><b>Curse you</b>, Aqua-Scum!!!


I remain, as always...


Sleepless in (not) Seattle.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5806</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5806</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:39:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've been a fan of Walken for some time now, and for the roles I've seen him play, here are my favorites (in no particular order):

1. <i>Nick of Time</i>; The bad guy he played perhaps the oiliest, snakiest, most evil bad guy I've ever seen, completely remorseless and utterly convincing in that way that only he can bring.

2. <i>Biloxi Blues</i>; his portrayal of Sgt. Toomey was one of the most hysterical things I've ever seen; alternatively intimidating, compelling, and sympathetic (or just pathetic), and always batshit-crazy, anyone who hasn't see this movie should, just for him.

3. <i>Catch Me If You Can</i>; wow.  Playing Leo's emotionally and financially broken father was heart rending.  That scene where Frank Jr. <i><b>begs</b></i> his father to ask him to stop breaking the law, to stop sticking it to the government that ruined him, was Oscar-worthy.

I also liked his turns in<i> Pulp Fiction, Man of the Year</i> (one of only two good things about that film),<i>Wedding Crashers, Man on Fire</i> and, God help me, <i>Click</i>.

My least favorite:

1. <i>Balls of Fury</i>: as you said, Nico, he's become basically a caricature of himself, and he completely phoned in his performance here, something I wouldn't have expected of him five years ago.

2. <i>Sleepy Hollow</i>; yeah, Tim Burton.  Yeah, Johnny Depp.  But I think of several actors that could have played the Headless Horseman more effectively.

3. <i>Batman Returns</i>; 'nuff said.

I won't even dignify films like <i>Joe Dirt</i>, or <i>Envy</i>, or <i>Kangaroo Jack</i>, or <i>The Prophecy</i>, or <i>Last Man Standing</i>, or, Holy Hell, Batman, <i>Gigli</i>, by subjecting myself to even five damn minutes of those films.

He's gonna be 65 next spring, and I look at his upcoming projects on IMDb, and I see.  OMG.  A movie called <i>The Dirt</i>, which is a biopic about... Motley Crue.  Yeah, that's a story just beggin' to be told.  (FYI, Walken plays Ozzy Osbourne, and Val Kilmer is rumored to be playing David Lee Roth.  I'd be vomiting copiously into a bucket right now, if I didn't already know that the film is being directed by Larry Charles (<i>Borat</i>).

And no one will ever do a better Walken than Kevin Spacey.  Just like no one will ever do a better Shatner than Kevin Pollak.  Thus it is written.

I remain, as always,

Ep-steen.  "(Ep-STINE?)"  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5821</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5821</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:04:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Shryke42]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I have a random sort of question. Did the trailer to <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=R9u_Fjl9uPk" target="_new" rel="nofollow">We Own the Night,</a> remind anyone of <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=_LpBTzmepyA" target="_new" rel="nofollow">the Departed</a>? Maybe it is the font, landscape background, or color scheme they use, but I can look at it without thinking, "here is a clone of a remake." I don't know. I added the trailers for convenience. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5826</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5826</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:01:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ JackO]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>StnMan5 wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote>I really do want to see We Own the Night, although I think it would have done better had it been titled The Departed2, but it looks good on its own none the less.


&nbsp;
		</blockquote>

Yes! That is what I was taking about in my earlier post! Thank you StnMan!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5827</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5827</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:04:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ JackO]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ How ironic! I thought I was the only one who picked up that vibe from the trailer. It <i>definitely</i> seems to be attempting to cash in on the success of The Departed, and as many have noted, it likely will.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5888</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5888</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:38:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ becs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Becs, I've yet to meet someone who hasn't thought We Own felt like a remake/rip-off of The Departed. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5894</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5894</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:35:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ numbersix_99]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ As much as I want to see <i>Ben Stiller</i> in a film again. <u>Heartbreak Kid</u> doesn't catch my eye as much as <u>30 Days of Night</u>. I honestly hate the <u>Resident Evil</u>, zombie-based films but this trailer was telling me an entirely different story.

<b>1</b> 30 Days of Night
<b>2</b> Heartbreak Kid
<b>3</b> Gone Baby Gone
<b>4</b> Dan In Real Life
<b>5</b> Saw IV]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5896</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5896</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:48:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ iamhollywood]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Like so many others here, the thing that has made <i>We Own the Night </i>stick out in <u><i><b>my</b></i></u> mind -- other than its exceptional cast -- is its trailer's obvious, even glaring debt to <i>The Departed</i>.  The constant usage of the Brooklyn / New York City skyline throughout, which is a perfect copy of <i>The Departed</i>'s own opening-credits Boston skyline, to me at least hints at sheer laziness bordering on plagiarism by the production company.  (Of course, we might have expected this from <b>2929 </b>-- Dallas Mavericks owner <b>Mark Cuban</b>'s film production company -- I mean, the guy's made the better part of a career parroting <b>Donald Trump</b>, among others.  Although, perhaps I'm being unfair and, anyway, I happen to like the guy.)  We've seen this sort of thing before, sure -- one successful movie's trailers are instantly appropriated by others -- but I for one am sick of it.  If I want to see the same damn movie all over again, I'll just pop in my <i>Departed </i>DVD.

Here's hoping the plot isn't a rehash of <i>Departed</i>'s third act -- the whole avenge-thy-father-figure vibe I get from the trailer, again, is <u><b><i></i>VERY</b></u> familiar to fans of Scorcese's most recent movie -- not to mention his <u><b>third</b></u>-most-recent, <i>Gangs of New York</i>. 

Anyway, I'll be there on opening weekend.  <b>Wahlberg</b>, <b>Phoenix</b>, <b>Duvall</b>:  this film has <u><i><b>more</b></i></u> than enough promise to warrant my nine bucks.


I remain, as always...


Nico. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5901</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5901</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:34:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5929</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5929</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:05:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Like so many of <b>Scorcese</b>'s films (<i>The Color of Money</i>, <i>The Age of Innocence</i>, <i>Gangs of New York</i>, <i>Goodfellas </i>and <i>The Aviator</i>, to name just the ones that come to mind immediately), I find <i>The Departed </i>to be initially somewhat disappointing, but, ultimately, and especially upon repeated viewings, frankly mesmerizing.  It's the details, the dialogue and, especially, the acting, that earn my respect and admiration in the long run.  I don't like the way Scorcese edits his films, but he shoots them beautifully, and manages -- like <b>Stephen King</b>, in his <i><u>own</u></i> medium, the novel -- in just a few brief lines of dialogue, to create utterly complete and fully fleshed-out characters.  Besides, <i>The Departed</i>'s just so damned cool:  From <b>Mark Wahlberg </b>telling the yawning FBI hack to "blow me," and sharing his philosophy of treating with the feds, like fungi:  "Feed 'em shit and leave 'em in the dark", to <b>Ray Winstone </b>blearily lecturing <b>Leo</b>:  "Now, there's guys you can hit, and guys you can't.  Now this ain't <i>quite</i> a guy you can't hit, but he's <u><i>almost</i></u> a guy you can't hit, so I'm going to make a ruling on this right f@%#in' now:  <i> You <u>don't</u>... f@%#in'... hit 'im.</i>"  To <b>Nicholson </b>waving a dead guinea's "fun" hand, wrapped in a Zip-loc baggie, in front of Costigan while he's tearing a lobster apart, to Capt. Queenan (<b>Martin Sheen</b>), who's all but soiling himself with fear, coolly asking, "Any of you mugs got a light?" just seconds before he does a triple-pike off the high board.  (Earning only an 8.5 from the East German judge, the dick.)  In my opinion, <i>The Departed </i>rivals <i>Tombstone</i>, word for word, for out-and-out coolness... and in <i><u>my</u></i> book, at least, that's really, really saying something.  

But, to each his or her own.  After all, I like <i>Coneheads</i>, too.


I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5937</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5937</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:57:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Personally, I was left disappointed walking out of the theatre after seeing The Departed. To me it was like the movie was the most intricate house of cards you could imagine, but in the last 5 minutes it got kicked, smashed, and blown over in every way possible. 

But, as my friend said on the way out - how else could it have ended?

Despite my disappointment, it is very rare that a movie comes so close to grasping perfection, and for that alone it deserves all the acclaim it got.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5952</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5952</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:47:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ becs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok Ok i am going to start a rant so be forewarned... Alright here we go. The Departed was fantastic it deserves all the awards it got and more. I have rarely seen a movie that well done. Everything the acting especially Mark Whalberg who was robbed and friggin Alan Arkin won come on he was the least deserving out of all the nominees.Anways The film was great and <span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal">tuan</span> the films doesnt get old it actually gets better with each viewing.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5969</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5969</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:24:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b>becs</b>:  Interesting stuff...


<blockquote>...[T]he movie was the most intricate house of cards you could imagine, but in the last 5 minutes it got kicked, smashed, and blown over in every way possible. But, as my friend said on the way out - how else could it have ended? &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Nodding]  There are a<b> <i><u>LOT</u> </i></b>of <b>Scorcese </b>films that do this, too -- build up this incredibly detailed, lovingly created world, of beloved characters with real relationships, in a pitch-perfect landscape, like a meticulously crafted sand castle -- most notably, <i>Taxi Driver</i>, <i>Casino</i>, <i>Cape Fear</i>, <i>Gangs of New York </i>and, most famously, <i>Goodfellas</i>... though also, if you're looking for it, in <i>Raging Bull</i>, <i>Mean Streets</i>, <i>After Hours</i>, and even <i>The King of Comedy</i>, as well as, to a certain extent (certainly, that encapsulated by the character arc of Vince), <i>The Color of Money</i> -- and then spend the last few minutes, up to the entire third act, elaborately, gleefully demolishing that world, as if the sand castle were now being systematically destroyed and blasted into incoherent dust by some gleefully anarchistic little bastard.  Half of me thinks that's the reason Scorcese <u><i>makes</i></u> movies -- he's like that kid everyone knew growing up, who spent whole weekends building these intricately exacting model airplanes in his room, who one day took 'em out back end blew 'em up with M-80s and filmed it, and it turns out that was the entire reason he bought 'em in the first place.  (In fact, <u><i><b>I</b></i></u> was "that kid," which may be why <i>Independence Day </i>continues to appeal to me.)  The guy gets as much, if not more, fun out of upending the world, than he did creating it in the first place.  Let's hope the Mormons are wrong, and <b>Marty </b>never gets his brilliant, diabolical hands on a universe of his <u><i><b>own</b></i></u>...  

Your friend was right, btw -- <i>The Departed </i>could not have ended any differently.  Scorcese wasn't trying to sell us on a fairy-tale world, where the bad guys get their comeuppance and the good guys, who all wear white hats, ride off into the sunset with the girl and the gold star.  In Scorcese's worlds, <u><b>EVERYBODY</b></u> gets dirty, <u><b>EVERYBODY</b></u> gets hurt, <u><b>EVERYBODY</b></u> gets theirs.  The good guys don't <i><u>always</u></i> win, and even the best deeds fail to go unpunished.  I think Martin Scorcese is an "Old Testament" guy.  Sometimes being virtuous ain't enough, and your house still gets burned down and your wife still turns into a pillar of salt and you still have to lay your son down on the altar, and even after doing all that, you <u><i>still</i></u> might not be allowed into the Promised Land, because, you know, for all your good qualities, you were weak and ultimately found wanting, too.  Love may conquer all, but life -- and death -- will put even <u><i><b>THAT</b></i></u> under its heel at the end.  Just like us.



<blockquote>Despite my disappointment, it is very rare that a movie comes so close to grasping perfection, and for that alone it deserves all the acclaim it got. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Agreed.  Though I still don't think it quite deserved Best Picture.  (<u><i><b>No</b></i></u> remake, in my opinion, no matter how cleverly adapted and exquisitely crafted, does.)


<b>transformers</b>:  <u><i><b>THAT</b></i></u> was a "rant"?  Dude, no, no, no, that was a mild outcry.  You want <b><u><i>rants</i></u></b>, go back and read some of my columns, especially the one I did on the lack of appreciation for <i>Pride</i>, or when I said <b>Ice Cube </b>was the next big thing, or when I worshipped at the altar of <b>Kevin Costner</b>.  <u><i><b>THOSE</b></i></u> were rants.  However, I digress...  [Grin]


<blockquote>I have rarely seen a movie that well done. Everything the acting especially <b>Mark Whalberg </b>who was robbed... .Anways The film was great and <b>tuan </b>the films doesnt get old it actually gets better with each viewing. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Nodding enthusiastically]  I've seen films better shot and edited, tell the truth, but <i>The Departed </i>had fine, fine acting in spades.  Even <b>Alec Baldwin</b>, who normally I think has about as much stage presence as <b>Al Gore</b>, or even <b>Al Roker</b>, turned in a credible performance.  However -- and, really, I <u><i>don't</i></u> mean to quibble, here -- although I thought Wahlberg's work was <u><i>strong</i></u>, and I think he really, really <u><i><b>NEEDS</b></i></u> an Oscar, soon, I don't think he turned in the <i><u>finest</u></i> work of his <u><i><b>career</b></i></u>, here (for <u><i><b>that</b></i></u>, see either:  <i>Boogie Nights</i>, <i>Three Kings</i>, <i>The Perfect Storm </i>or <i>Invincible</i>, take your pick); nor do I think he should have been nominated for his performance in <u><i><b>THIS</b></i></u> film, which was, I hate to say it, a glorified cameo, after all.  (Let the baying, raising of pitchforks and lighting of torches begin!).  I think <b>Leonardo DiCaprio </b>should have been nominated for Best Actor, and I think both <b>Jack Nicholson </b><u><i>AND</i></u> <b>Matt Damon </b>should have gotten nods for Best Supporting Actor, and I think <u><i><b>Damon</b></i></u> should have won over <b>Arkin </b>and all other comers.  (And <b>Forest Whitaker</b>, obviously, ought to have won Best Actor for <i>The Last King of Scotland</i>.)  That, to me, would be just. 

And, <b>tuan</b>, I have to agree with <b>transformers</b> when he says <i>The Departed</i> not <i><u>only</u></i> holds up to, but vastly <u><i>improves</i></u> upon subsequent viewings.  (On the other claw, I suppose it's possible that even <i>House of Wax </i>becomes Oscar-worthy the eighty-third time.)  However, partner, no one can call out anyone else's tastes, so we'll agree to disagree there, as always.  [Grin]


And, with <i>that</i>, I remain, again as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5984</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5984</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:54:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nico, I like how you the world in a Scorcese film-
"In Scorcese's worlds, EVERYBODY gets dirty, EVERYBODY gets hurt, EVERYBODY gets theirs. The good guys don't always win, and even the best deeds fail to go unpunished. I think Martin Scorcese is an "Old Testament" guy. Sometimes being virtuous ain't enough, and your house still gets burned down and your wife still turns into a pillar of salt and you still have to lay your son down on the altar, and even after doing all that, you still might not be allowed into the Promised Land, because, you know, for all your good qualities, you were weak and ultimately found wanting, too. Love may conquer all, but life -- and death -- will put even THAT under its heel at the end. Just like us."

I tihnk that may be why I am not a Scorcese fan (But I love Sam Peckinpaugh- go figure).  Often his protagonists are rough, raw hard to love people that I can necver entirely care about.  I will never question his talent or abilty- he knows how to tell a story better than most of them.  But I have been able to wrap myself into his stories.

I guess I simple this way, but I love a movie where the boy gets the girl, the girl, the good guys where white hats, and the antogonsts get what he deserves in some devious way.  I don't always like a film like that, but I am more apt to watch and even rewatch it.
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5986</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5986</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:21:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jameydunne]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b>jamey</b>:


<blockquote>I tihnk that may be why I am not a Scorcese fan (But I love Sam Peckinpaugh- go figure).  &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Laughing]  It's okay -- My tastes aren't always entirely consistent, either.  Art ain't science.  Btw, one of the things I loved about <i><u>Deadwood</u> </i>was how <u><i><b>much</b></i></u> it reminded me of <b>Peckinpah</b>'s <i>The Wild Bunch</i>...  And, actually, I think there's a correlation to be made between <i>Bunch </i>and some of <b>Scorcese</b>'s films, <u>particularly</u> <i>Goodfellas</i>, <i>Gangs of New York </i>and <i>Casino</i>...  Hmmmm, that's very interesting.  Good stuff, there.



<blockquote>Often his protagonists are rough, raw hard to love people that I can necver entirely care about.  &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Again -- is it Peckinpah, or Scorcese?  You could argue that <i>The Departed </i>is, in a way, an updated version of <i>Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid</i>...



<blockquote>I will never question his talent or abilty- he knows how to tell a story better than most of them.  But I have been able to wrap myself into his stories.&nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Nodding]  It's hard when the director keeps the protagonist / hero, as far as the audience is concerned, at an emotional arm's length.  That's one of my criticisms of Scorcese, too; at the end of the day, whether you're watching <b>Leonardo DiCaprio </b>(<i>The Aviator</i>, <i>Gangs of New York</i>, <i>The Departed</i>) or <b>Daniel Day-Lewis </b>(<i>The Age of Innocence</i>) or <b>Ray Liotta </b>(<i>Goodfellas</i>) or even <b>Robert De Niro </b>(<i>Taxi Driver</i>), you can't end up "rooting" for <u><i><b>anybody</b></i></u>, because the "good" or quasi-tolerable characters mainly end up messily deaded, and the nominal "hero" characters are, to put it bluntly, pretty much scumbags and psychopaths, or at a minimum(as we saw in DiCaprio's roles) somewhat off-putting, tempermental cyphers.  It's hard to give a damn about someone potentially being blown away, when you have very little empathy for that someone, no matter how cool, well-acted, perfectly-directed or even generously-lighted that character is.



<blockquote>I guess I simple this way, but I love a movie where the boy gets the girl, the girl, the good guys where white hats, and the antogonsts get what he deserves in some devious way.  I don't always like a film like that, but I am more apt to watch and even rewatch it.&nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Hey, there's nothing "<u>simple</u>" about that.  I like spicy food -- there's nothing better, you can feed me <i>habañero</i>-seasoned <i>sopa de tortilla </i>six days out of every week, and twice on Sundays -- but, every so often, I like to pour myself a tall glass of chilled whole milk and set a package of Oreo Double-Stufs on my belly, and just drift into a happy, cholesterolic sugar coma.  (And then, beat away my cats and daughter, who'll be jumping all over me trying to get at either my milk or my cookies.)  There's nothing wrong with comfort food.  It is, after all, comforting.  Most of the same people who get off on Quentin Tarantino (<i>habañero</i>-seasoned <i>sopa de tortilla </i>) grew up watching, and always return to, <i>Star Trek: The Next Generation </i>(Oreos and cold milk), I find.  Even <b>Marlon Brando </b>probably liked peach cobbler, you know what I mean?


(Damn, now I'm hungry.)


I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5989</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5989</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:57:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nico good point but i really thought Mark Whalberg desrved that oscar i have seen all of those films you listed where is finest work was done except for Boogie Nights. He was great in Three Kings and Invincible he was good in The Perfect Storm but not great. But i really thought his best work was in The Departed he was also very good in Shooter. But Nico i forgot about Three Kings what a great film i havent seen that for a while i should watch that again i love that movie.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5998</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#5998</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:52:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [Nodding]  <b>Mark Wahlberg</b>'s ten best roles, to date:  (My own opinion, here, obviously...)


[1]   Eddie Adams / "Dirk Diggler", <i>Boogie Nights</i>.  A nearly flawless film, and actually one that was a good deal <u><i><b>less</b></i></u> sensational / ribald, and much <u><i><b>MORE</b></i></u> wholesome / conventional / "family values"-affirming, than its overblown reputation would have people think (I mean, it's basically the parable of the Prodigal Son, yeah?) -- one that <u><i>ought</i></u> to have earned Wahlberg a Best Actor nomination at a <u><i>minimum</i></u>... I mean, come on, <b>Dustin Hoffman</b>, for <i>Wag the Dog</i>?!?!?  What was the bigger fraud, the plot, or the nomination?  Unbelievable...

[2]   Seargeant First Class Troy Barlow, <i>Three Kings</i>.  Honestly, <u><b><i>EVERYBODY</i></b></u> needed nominations for this one.  <b>Ice Cube</b> (the...next...<b><i><u>REALLY</u></i>...<u><i>BIG</i></u>...thing</b>!) included.

[3]   Vince Papale, <i>Invincible</i>.  Yeah, yeah, I know.  It's a feel-good sports movie:  <i>Rudy Goes to Philly</i>.  Watch it again.  This is the film that proved to me Wahlberg is going to be a <u><i><b>GREAT</b></i></u> actor, one of the very best of his generation, because he so totally <u><i>UNDERPLAYS</i></u> this role, allowing it to breathe, and so creates an exceptionally grounded, relatable, honest character, one who persuades us of his strength and self-sufficiency while at the same time allowing us to see his vulnerability and desire to please.  (<b>Greg Kinnear </b>turned in a very fine performance as a young Dick Vermeil, too.)

[4]   Bobby Shatford, <i>The Perfect Storm</i>.  I don't care what <b>Wolfgang Petersen </b>was <u><i>trying</i></u> to make, this ain't an action movie.  Neither is it yet another spectacular special-effects film, though there are certainly some breathtaking sequences and visuals in this film.  This is a small, intimate, at times even profound character drama, one that frankly feels far closer to a stage adaptation of a Herman Melville work than, say, <i>Dante's Peak</i>.  Here, again Wahlberg dials it down, avoiding the certain temptation of turning in a <b><u>BIG</u>! <u>LOUD</u>!</b> performance in a <b><u>BIG</u>! <u>LOUD</u>! <u>HUGE</u>!</b> blockbuster film.  Shatford, a little like Eddie Adams, is a very young boy playing at being a far more mature man; he wears the responsibilities of his life, to his girlfriend (a superb performance, one of many recently, by the exquisite <b>Diane Lane</b>), his boss (<b>George Clooney</b>, in typically fine form) and his crewmates (so many outstanding performances, I'd run out of room cataloguing them all), a little like <b>Tom Hanks</b> did the adult Josh Baskin's too-large-by-half clothes at the end of <i>Big</i>.  Like the <i>Andrea Gail</i> itself, Bobby's out of his depth, and Wahlberg manages to walk that fine line between cocky indestructibility and knowing dread <i><b><u>PERFECTLY</u></b></i>.  This performance might even deserve to be higher on my list, actually.  

[5]   Staff Sergeant Sean Dignam, <i>The Departed</i>.  As I said, I consider this to be pretty much a cameo role -- he's onscreen perhaps fifteen minutes in the entire film, and as his character is primarily the "bad cop" counterpart or foil to, well, everybody else, I can't rate his work much higher than this -- he's R2-D2 to <b>Martin Sheen</b>'s C-3PO, after all.  (Anyone want to bet whether <b><u>THAT</u></b> analogy's ever been used before?)  But he infuses this part with such legitimacy, it's hard not to be a fan.  I love the little touches, like when he eases off and slides, effortlessly, from prick to concerned colleague, just like that in his scenes with <b>Leonardo DiCaprio</b>.  Not too many actors could pull that off convincingly -- <i>Hey, what's the deal with this guy?  Is he a jerk, or a friend?  This is bullsh!t</i> could well have been audiences' response, but it wasn't, and that's entirely due to Wahlberg's craftsmanship.  He absolutely <b><u>SELLS</u></b> us on this tough, complex, nuanced character, and he does it with a bare minimum of dialogue.  (And not a few four-letter words.)  A home run.

[6]   Chris ('Izzy') Cole, <i>Rock Star</i>.  Another performance similar to Wahlberg's in <i>Invincible</i>, as well as in <i>Boogie Nights</i>.  Izzy's a little less complicated than Vince, but the youthful exuberance, the naivety, the shining ebullience, is set off nicely by Izzy's transformation (evolution?) back into a wiser, darker, more mature Chris.  This is a <i>decent</i> film, but it could have been great.  Some of the casting was off (others, particularly of <b>Dominic West</b>, were spot-on), and too much attention was paid to a truly icky hermaphroditic love triangle in my opinion...  It's a shame.  Worth checking out, if only to appreciate <b>Jennifer Aniston</b> (cast, here, as Eye Candy) and a very early <b>Timothy Olyphant</b> (Seth Bullock of <u><i>Deadwood</i></u>), btw.

[7]   Bobby Mercer, <i>Four Brothers</i>.  This is a straightforward story, but Wahlberg invests it with a brooding gravitas that was perhaps the most compelling thing about the film.  I wanted to like this title a lot more than I ended up doing.

[8]   Leo Handler, <i>The Yards</i>.  An up-and-coming <b>Joaquin Phoenix </b>stole the show, but, again, Wahlberg brings such grittiness and capability to his role, that you almost don't realize how good a job he's doing.  This is an incredibly underappreciated film in my opinion.

[9]   Danny Wallace, <i>The Corruptor</i>.  Holy Hell, am I going to catch it for <b><u>THIS</u></b> one (at least, until folks get to [10]); but, you know, this is one of the very best "buddy" movies ever to come out of the genre, in my opinion.  The acting <b>all-around</b> is solid, even by <b>Chow Yun-Fat</b>, who's pretty hit-and-miss when it comes to his Western roles; this is the film that first put Wahlberg on my screen, actually, since I didn't see <i>Boogie Nights</i> until much, much later.

Finally... [10]  Captain Leo Davidson, <i>Planet of the Apes</i>.  Wahlberg does just what he ought to have done in this film:  Keep it serious and keep his eye on the ball.  But, Hell, I love the film, even though its ending is one of the most-maligned in recent cinematic history.  (I happen to disagree.)  No, it's <b><u><i>NOT</i></u></b> the original, and Wahlberg is certainly <b><u><i>NO</i></u> Charlton Heston</b> (and, seriously, thank God.  I always wonder why <b>William Shatner</b> gets parboiled for <u><i><b>HIS</b></u></i> scenery-chewing overacting, but no one <u><b>ever</b></u> seems to call St. God on it...).  Neither did it, or he, try to be.  This is, seriously, a far, far better film than most people give it credit for.  I happen to think <b>Tim Burton</b> is <b><u>extremely</u></b> over-hyped, but he knocked it over the center-field wall with <i>Planet of the Apes</i>, in my opinion.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some cast-iron skivvies to don; I have a feeling the hounds have already been released for what I've opined, here...


I remain, as always...


Nico.  (Down, Fluffy, down!)
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6001</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6001</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:52:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I see your well founded opinions there Nico, but I have to say I am a little surprised that Italian Job and Shooter didn't even earn an honorable mention.
Obviously Charlize Theron stole the show in Italian job, but as always Marky Mark was there to round out and fill in what was lacking. 
its what he <b>does</b>. pretty much every role he has is understated because he isn't the actual lead, and when he <i>is</i> the lead, he works in such a way that shine a spotlight on those acting around him, while he just flows naturally into the scene.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6002</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6002</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:13:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ becs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b>becs</b>:  Good points.  I saw <i>The Italian Job </i>as such an ensemble film, and <b>Wahlberg</b>'s role so narrowly drawn, that I didn't even consider it.  (Although I love the film, and am eagerly anticipating its sequel, <i>The Brazilian Job</i>...  to be followed by what? <i> The Indonesian Job</i>?  <i>The Paraguayan Job</i>?  <i>The Ivory Coastian Job</i>?)  

I didn't like <i>Shooter</i>, for a lot of reasons.  I hate it when a film aims too high, and misses.  The script needed to be toned down, and its characters given less exposition and more, you know, to actually <u><i><b>DO</b></i></u>.  This was a film that tried to be taut, intelligent and deep; it managed to be mildly suspenseful, I suppose, but little else.  I'll take <b>Sydney Pollack</b>'s <i>The Interpreter </i>over this any day.



<blockquote>...[A]s always Marky Mark was there to round out and fill in what was lacking.  its what he does. pretty much every role he has is understated because he isn't the actual lead, and when he is the lead, he works in such a way that shine a spotlight on those acting around him, while he just flows naturally into the scene. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
What a terrific comment!  And you're 100% correct.  Wahlberg's one of the most "giving" actors I know; I put him up there with <b>Tim Roth</b>, <b>Daniel Day-Lewis</b>, <b>Gary Sinise</b>, <b>David Morse </b> and <b>Tom Hanks</b>, in that regard.  

Good stuff, <b>becs</b>, keep it comin'!


I remain, as always...


Nico.
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6008</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6008</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:30:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6013</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6013</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:13:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nico, I can see why you liked Planet of the Apes.  I really liked it up until the last scene.  I have never watched a movie that I liked turn me off so quickly.  If it would have stopped after the shuttle launched into space.  I think I really would have liked it.

Could somebody explain to me what about The Perfect Storm is so note worthy?  The effects are impressive, the cast's interaction was solid, but the story never really me completely and the end really pissed me off.  I felt like 'what was the point of this movie'?  Someone please educate me.  I need learnin' on the subject.

As for Mark Wahlberg in general, I always thought he was a likable and servicable lead.  Nothing great, but easy to watch.  I think his range is similar to Ben Afflecks (not a rip, just a description), but Wahlberg seems to hacve a better idea of his range and talents than Affleck.

I like Wahlberg in Italian Job and Invincable, and am curious to see Brazilian Job (is it just me, or is the title kinda pornish?).  I think if the core cast remains the same it will be solid, and the bigest question mark will be the plot- why are they back at it again?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6016</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6016</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:35:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jameydunne]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b>tuan</b>:  [Laughing]  Sorry, dude, I only have it in me to write one <u><i>Why I Needed</i> Superman Returns</u> per month.  (Which, btw, I <u><i><b>STILL</b></i></u> haven't finished!)


But... Dude, seriously, what's <u><i><b>not</b></i></u> to love?  Forget the special effects, they were the <u><i><b>LEAST</b></i></u> "special" thing about the <i>Planet of the Apes </i>re-up.  What about the sets, the art direction, the costumes, the prosthetics?  What about the acting?  (Yes, I really, really <u><i><b>DID</b></i></u> say, "<i>What about the <u><b>acting</b></u>?</i>")  I mean, <b>Tim Roth</b>?  <b>Helena Bonham Carter</b>?  <b>Paul</b> friggin' <b>Giamatti</b>?  Come <u><i><b>ON</b></i></u>!!!  The film oozed coolness out of every pore, from the spectacular cinematography to the wholly inventive props and armor; from the vision of a parallel, simian civilization to the entirely believable pseudo-attraction between a man and his chimp (or, erm, actually, a chimp and her man).  Plus, a cameo by <b>Charlton Heston</b>!  Not to mention, <b>Danny Elfman</b>'s <i><u>incredible</u> </i>score, which never, ever leaves my CD changer...  I love me some <i>Apes</i>!  Come on and rock me, Dr. Gaius.  Now, go on, fling poo at me or something.


P.S.  Dude, may I just say, <b><u><i>F@%#</i></u> Kevin Smith</b>.  Overhyped, overexposed, overweight blowhard, he managed to write a terrific script for <i>Dogma</i>, yeah, and <i>Clerks </i>was a bit of inspired lunacy, but the man hit his career apex with <i>Mallrats </i>(or, if you prefer, <i>Chasing Amy</i>), and has spent three-quarters of his career just telling the same, not-terribly-funny-to-begin-with joke, over and over and over again.  He's like <b>Woody Allen </b>(but with even less talent... Man, I can't <u><i>believe</i></u> I just said that), doing the same shtick for decades, or a modern-day version of <b>Cheech & Chong</b>.  I'll say this for him:  He's not a bad actor; he was the only thing worth remembering about <i>Catch and Release</i>.  But, dude, seriously, you're over.  Go back to film school, or working behind the counter at Blockbuster, or pump gas, or something, until you have, you know, another <u><i><b>NEW</b></i></u> idea.  (Which would be, for those of you at home keeping score, his <b><u>second</u></b>.)  

That being said, Smith's blog is some funny friggin' sh!t.


<b>jamey</b>:  

<blockquote>Nico, I can see why you liked Planet of the Apes. I really liked it up until the last scene. I have never watched a movie that I liked turn me off so quickly. If it would have stopped after the shuttle launched into space. I think I really would have liked it. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
See, I "get" the ending, I think.  I <b><u>like</u> </b>films that don't have to have everything wrapped up in a tidy bow, that require the audience to stretch <b><i><u>their</u> </i></b>imaginations a little, too, to come up with their <u><i><b>OWN</b></i></u> plausible explanation.  I don't mind working at it.  Besides, it was better than using something ridiculous like <i>tachyons </i>[barf] to explain a Problematic Temporal Plot Complication, anyway, wasn't it?



<blockquote>Could somebody explain to me what about The Perfect Storm is so note worthy? The effects are impressive, the cast's interaction was solid, but the story never really me completely and the end really pissed me off. I felt like 'what was the point of this movie'? Someone please educate me. I need learnin' on the subject. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
If you don't mind, I'll step aside and let someone else have at it, for now.  I'm busy penning my defense of <i>Superman Returns</i>.  [Grin]



<blockquote>...Wahlberg seems to hacve a better idea of his range and talents than Affleck. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
I don't think we'll ever <u><i>really</i></u> know how good an actor Ben Affleck <u><i><b>MIGHT</b></i></u> have been, now...  at least, until <u><i><b>HE</b></i></u> hits "middle-age."  I personally feel, had he <u><i><b>not</b></i></u> decided to take the easy path to superstardom instead of honing his craft (like his buddy, <b>Matt Damon</b>, did), he might well have been the next <b>George Clooney</b>, or <b>Tyrone Powers</b>.



<blockquote>I ...am curious to see <i>Brazilian Job </i>(is it just me, or is the title kinda pornish?). &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Snort][Titter]



<blockquote>...[T]he bigest question mark will be the plot- why are they back at it again? &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Contractual obligations.



I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6020</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6020</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:50:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The Perfect Storm was amazing. The solid interaction between the cast  that you were talking about is exactly the point of the movie...It's about the need for one another in times of crisis. There was no way they were getting out alive and they all knew that, BUT they were all there for each other and tried, and that's what life is about. Trying.

Also, please don't badmouth my Ben Affleck. He's gotten some tough criticism, but I believe he's a very versatile and entertaining not to mention talented actor. Please don't bring up Gigli unless you've seen it. And Bounce wasn't TERRIBLE. Hope floats...okay. I'll give you that one. And I'm sorry I got defensive. I apologize considering that's not exactly what you were saying. Although I disagree with you about Mark Wahlberg...I think he's a good actor, but I don't think he's more comfortable than Ben Affleck.(Shakespeare in Love?)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6021</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6021</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:57:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ StnMan5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>Nicodemus wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote>
 <b>Tim Roth</b>, <b>Daniel Day-Lewis</b>, <b>Gary Sinise</b>, <b>David Morse </b> and <b>Tom Hanks</b>, in that regard.  
&nbsp;
		</blockquote>
The only one I would disagree with here would be Day-Lewis, as I see him as somewhat of a showboat, though I admit I have purposely avoided some of what are his most acclaimed films. 
Also, it quite seriously crushes me that Tim Roth isn't given more opportunities. I fell madly in love with his acting when I was 15 or 16 and happened across The Legend of 1900 on tv. I tracked it down when it showed again and I still have the video tape today.  If you haven't seen the movie its absolutely stunning, it was written and directed by Giuseppe Tornatore who was behind  Cinema Paradiso, so I'm sure you can imagine the depth of it, it is one of the very few movies that I cry during - no matter how many times i watch it, because it is just that freaking moving.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6022</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6022</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:03:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ becs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Point taken (about <b>Mr. Day-Lewis</b>).  <b>Russell Crowe</b>, then.


I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6025</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6025</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:10:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p>

		<cite>StnMan5 wrote:</cite><br>
		<blockquote>
Also, please don't badmouth my Ben Affleck. He's gotten some tough criticism, but I believe he's a very versatile and entertaining not to mention talented actor. Please don't bring up Gigli unless you've seen it. And Bounce wasn't TERRIBLE. Hope floats...okay. I'll give you that one. And I'm sorry I got defensive. I apologize considering that's not exactly what you were saying. Although I disagree with you about Mark Wahlberg...I think he's a good actor, but I don't think he's more comfortable than Ben Affleck.(Shakespeare in Love?)&nbsp;
		</blockquote>

StnMan5 - not sure what you are getting at, as Affleck wasn't in Hope Floats (maybe you mean Forces of Nature?), and his role in Shakespeare in Love is hardly worth noting.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6029</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6029</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:21:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ becs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Forces of Nature!  Good call...I get all of those crappy late 90s romantic comedies starring sandra bullock confused.

I was just saying...Ben Affleck is an excellent (yes i will use that word) actor.

And as for his role in shakespeare in love not being noteworthy...watch it again right now.  He always makes the most of his parts, and that's what makes him one of the best actors of our time.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6031</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6031</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:31:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ StnMan5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6032</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6032</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:33:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oooooh, see, I really, really, really liked <b>Spielberg</b>'s <i>War of the Worlds</i>, too.  It wasn't perfect, in fact I would have to say that I'm <u><i>slightly</i></u> more fond of <b>Tim Burton</b>'s <i>Planet of the Apes</i>, but I saw <i>WotW</i> four times in-theater, and it scared the bejeepers out of me, <b><u><i>EVERY</i></u>. SINGLE. TIME.</b>  I even thought <b>Cruise </b>did a decent job -- at least, it got him whacking away at bug-eyed, aluminum alien pseudopods for awhile, instead of, you know, <b>Brooke Shields </b>-- though on the whole I liked him better in <i>Mission: Impossible III</i>.  Though I wasn't quite so impressed by <b>Dakota Fanning </b>as everyone else seemed to be.

...Ever wonder why in the Hell you people listen to me, anyway?  [Grin]


I remain, as always...


Nico.


P.S. :  

<blockquote>I wanted the apes to kill <b>Wahlberg </b>already and everyone else just like I was praying for the tripods to kill <b>Tom Cruise </b>and his whiny kids. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Snicker][gigglesnort]  This reminds me of a marginally famous quote I contributed to another entertainment-industry Website, last year, regarding CBS's (then, new) series <i><u>Jericho</u></i>:  "It's always a bad sign when I start rooting for the 'bad guys.'  Come on, Cesium-135!"


]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6039</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6039</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:51:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm with you, Nico- Planet of the Apes is one of the worst movies of the last decade, and I have no faith in Burton's talent anymore (Charlie and the Crap Factory proved this).

War of the Worlds, on the other hand, is one of the best blockbusters of the last few years- sure, the ending was a bit lame (man, we really didn't have to try hard to beat those guys), but the action sequences were astoundingly directed. Spielberg can direct in his sleep, considering the film took 6 months from prep to post. And such memorable scenes- the ascent of the first "machine", the destruction of the (New Jersey?) turnpike, the flaming train, the crowd rush at the ferry, the probe in the house... all brilliant. 

Makes me wish that Spielberg would direct all action movies, but didn't have final cut of the final 20 minutes. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6044</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6044</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:02:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ numbersix_99]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6047</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6047</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 05:29:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Gotta agree with Nico, I think Spielberg's War of the Worlds gets a bad shake by the general public sometimes. Too many people were either expecting more action because of the stupid commercials that highlighted combat-copters or they were just turned off by the silly antics of off-screen Tom Cruise. However, WotW does so many things so well. 

For example, the initial invasion of the tripods? Holy crap, that had to have been one of the coldest, most intense movie-going experiences in my life. It wasn't like ID4 where it felt like a blockbuster/cartoon. Those tripods were VICIOUS. It was great to see the Cruise's character as an everyday guy who had <b>no</b> chance whatsoever of saving the day. The 360-degree camera that whizzed in and out of the car when his family was fleeing the city was a great moment of fear and panic. So was the scene the rowdy crowd tried to steal Cruise's car. That's a side of humanity you rarely see on-screen, that we can be selfish, paranoid people when it comes to survival. And how ballsy was Spielberg by not going up over that hill to show the destructo-feast of copters vs. tripods? He kept it completely true to the POV of the film, that we would only see what Cruise's character saw. Of course, the ending (like so many of Stevie's) was out of left field, but at least it was true to the book and kept with the idea that human beings aren't as in control of the world as we think. Anyway, that's just my two cents. Sorry to digress from the October movies...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6049</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6049</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:19:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ la_resistance28]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b>Six</b>:  Sorry, maybe I suffered a stroke mid-digression and ended up saying something <u><i><b>TOTALLY</b></i></u> <u><i><b>BARKING</b></i></u> different from what I intended to, <b>bu-<i><u>uuuut</u></i></b>, I like <u><b>BOTH</b></u> <i>PotA</i> <u><b><i>AND</i></b></u> <i>WotW</i>, which sound like an activist animal-rights organization and a local gymnastics franchise, actually.  

I saw what <b>Tim Burton </b>was <u>trying</u> to accomplish with <i>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory</i>; it was spectacular, it was imaginative, it was interesting.  <b><i>Meh</i></b>.  A combination of No Laughs and General Creepiness does not a hit kid's movie make, in my opnion.  That's more in keeping with a stand-up act performed by <b>Danny Bonaduce</b>.

I defend Spielberg's <i>War of the Worlds</i>, or try to, all the time, to the point, actually, that I'm very nearly sick of trying to convince people.  I <i><u>do</u></i> think it could have been better cast -- I frankly find it hard to imagine that a man who spends his free time and discretionary income worshipping the amalgamated-via-sperm-milkshake son of <b>Magneto</b>,  <b>Ming the Merciless </b>and <b>Dr. Phil</b>...

<a href='http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Xenu_BBC_Panorama.jpg' target='_new' rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Xenu_BBC_Panorama.jpg</a>

...would be so bleedin' <u><i><b>distressed</b></i></u> by the arrival of a fleet of giant mechanical dung beetles from the Delta Quadrant, who make pretty pretty music on space tubas and then systematically vaporize a sizeable portion of Earth's population and bad '60's architecture, thereby making way for the ascension of a Thetacracy, out of the <i><u>Battlefield: Earth</u></i>-like ruins.  So <u><i>what</i></u> if his best friend, -- a mildly retarded Pep Boy, btw, and, gee, Dad, you <u><i>WONDER</i></u> why Mom didn't stick around for poker / <i>WWE Slamfest! </i>night and countless anniversaries with reservations for Hooters? -- turned into a talking sack of flour, like from <i>Aqua Teen Hunger Force</i>?  If the college motto is, <i>Rent a friend!  Join a Frat</i>, surely the <u><i>Scientologist</i></u> creed is, <i>Ain't got friends?  We'll convert 'em for ya!</i>  Go, Johnny, go!  <i>Ooh ooh <b><u>AHH</u> <u>AHH</u></b>!</i>  However, perhaps I digress.

Although the ending of <i>WotW </i>was a nice little tribute to the book's, I agree, it didn't work.  And, honestly, I mean, I love the guy, but, come on.  <b>Morgan Freeman</b>'s portrayed God, The President and, now, The Voice of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galactic Green Zone.  Wouldn't God, or Zeus, or Xenu, not be <i>slurring his words </i>quite so much, as if he'd gone on a bender and then decided to sober up by watching monster robot crickets obliterate the Earth to make way for a new hyperspace bypass?  And didn't that water look dirty to you?  Seriously, <u><i>someone</i></u> should upgrade Boston's public water supply.  I mean, erm, once there <u><i><b>IS</b></i></u> a Boston again and all that.  Here, God, have another.  It's on the house.  Matter of fact, it's pretty much all yours, anyway, right?

I agree:  "<i>Spielberg can direct in his sleep.</i>"  And considering some of the perspectives I've run into (crashed into, actually) on this Forum, this week, some folks might think he actually <u><i><b>DID</b></i></u>, during production of <i>The Terminal</i>, anyway.  [Shaking head]  To each his own.

There are images from <i>War of the Worlds </i>I am quite simply never going to get out of my head.  They've been burned into my brain, like a Martian death ray or <b>Howard Dean</b>'s "I Have A Scream" speech a few years back.  As you said, the initial emergence of the first Tripod...  The scene overlooking the Hudson Ferry, as the family huddles watching the Tripods pluck survivors out of the water... and then, up come <u><i>another</i></u> phalanx of 'em, <b><i><u>ZOT</u>!</i></b>ing the ones who made it to shore...  The scenes of 'em sniffing and poking around the farmhouse basement, the Slug Eye from Hell, which ought to have made <b>James Cameron </b>(inventor of the original CGI Water Tentacle, in <i>The Abyss</i>) breathe, <i>Oh, <u>DAMN</u></i>...  The scene when <b>Cruise </b>stumbles out of the farmhouse looking for his daughter, to look upon a wasted crimson vista I have forever termed, <i>Gone With the Solar Wind</i>...  The twitching, slurping, grasping Asshole of Doom (sorry, but didn't the Tripods' manner of eating bring the term, "<i>ass-munch</i>" into previously unimagined clarity?)...  The River of Swollen Corpses... Oh, my, the Amtrak from Hell.  Next stop, Purgatory!  All aboard!  For all that, it's what Spielberg <u><i><b>refused</b></i></u> to show us that was so damned scary...  That's the diabolical <u><i>brilliance</i></u> of the man.

A friend of mine who's far wittier and more famous than I, and also does this for a living, summed up <i>War of the World </i>this way:  <u><i>THIS</i></u> is what scares the Hell out of <i><u>Steven Spielberg</u></i>.  This is what <u><i><b>HIS</b></i></u> nightmares look and feel and sound like.  This is <u><i><b>HIS</b></i></u> version of Hell.  And, man, that's the guy who painted the beautiful, benign, hopeful pictures of <i>Close Encounters of the Third Kind</i>, of <i>E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial</i>.  If this is what makes <u><i><b>HIS</b></i></u> head spin around and catch on fire...  Man, am I glad I'm <u><i>not</i></u> inside the skull of Steven Spielberg.  There's some seriously twisted sh!t going on in there, dude.



<blockquote>Makes me wish that Spielberg would direct all action movies...  &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Seriously, look at the influences <i>Raiders of the Lost Ark</i>, <i>Jaws </i>and <i>Saving Private Ryan </i>have had on modern film.  Doesn't he? 
 

<b>tuan</b>:  

<blockquote>Woah, talk about disposable income.&nbsp;
		</blockquote>  
Hey, that's nothing.  I saw <i>Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country</i>, <i>The Matrix Reloaded</i>, <i>Titanic </i>and <i>Starship Troopers </i><u><i><b>SIX</b></i></u> times in theaters.  And, with the IMAX relaunch, I'm up to five, already for <i>Transformers</i>.  And I even pay bills once in awhile, too.

<blockquote>No I have to agree, the action scenes in War of the Worlds were amazingly directed, all the technical aspects including the sound effects and especially the visual effects, and the cinematography, simply amazing. I was pretty much on the edge of my seat once the first tripod popped out of the ground. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
I held my breath for two hours straight.  (Which may explain things, like my forecast for <i>The Ass. of Jesse James</i>...  Hypoxia will do wonders for your higher functions...)  The first time I saw <i>WotW</i>, it was like an amusement-park ride; I went straight back out to the ticket window and got in line again.  And again.  I saw it four times its first week.  Scared me more than any other movie, ever, with the exception of John Carpenter's <i>The Thing</i>.  And, erm, <i>Barbarella</i>, for different reasons.

I also quibble with the casting.  Although I really really <u><i>like</i></u> Dakota Fanning -- [sigh] not in that way, stop it, you cretins -- for, for example, her work in <i>Dreamer </i>and <i>Charlotte's Web </i>and the like, I wasn't all that impressed by her in this film.  I didn't get the whole <b>Miranda Otto </b>cameo, or that chick who used to play a loudmouthed lawyer on that long-gone sitcom, and while I loved certain elements of <b>Tim Robbins</b>' performance, on the whole I thought it was cheesy and over-the-top.  The only person who I think perfectly captured his role was the kid who played Cruise's son, I forget his name and am frankly too lazy at the moment to look it up, and <u><i>his</i></u> character arc ought to have ended right there in the Connecticut countryside -- it would have made the ending <i>SO</i>, <u><i><b>SO</b></i></u> much more powerful, and, you know, everything would have meant something, and Cruise's family's loss would have been proportional to the rest of humanity, which lost one out of every six people to giant extraterrestrial Roombas.

<blockquote>I also think the film took itself a little too seriously. I could care less about Tom Cruise's ill relationship with his son. And the fact that I hate Tom Cruise as a person, so, yeah, maybe that had a lot to do with me hating the film. All hail Lord Xenu! &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
See, I think Spielberg was trying to make us give a damn about this family, to make it (by way of its strained and imperfect relationships) <u><i>REAL</i></u> to the audience (just like he did in <i>Close Encounters </i>and <i>E.T.</i>, btw, and it's <i><b>amazing</b></i> how crass and cynical comparisons between the three films become when you break them down, scene-by-scene...  the bastard), so we wouldn't quibble so much about having to watch The Apocalypse, instead of in HDTV, through this one man's narrow, truncated, somewhat small perspective instead.  It worked, for me, and although I agree it probably could have been done "better," I for one am at a loss about how exactly to go about improving it.  It these events had happened to the Waltons, or the Walshes, or the Simpsons, would we have necessarily had a better time?  (Although... <i><u>The Simpsons</u></i>...  Hmmm.)  



<blockquote>I liked Tom in <i>Minority Report </i>well simply because that had a terrific script, when it all comes down to it, the script for War of the Worlds is very lacking. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Nodding]  I think I get what you're saying here.  Yeah, the <i>Minority Report</i> -- great film, btw, and <b>Colin Farrell</b>'s best performance, ever, not to mention his last <u>watchable</u> one -- script is pretty dense, and <i>WotW</i>'s is, by comparison, pretty "thin."  But, see, I think it works, because, sort of by necessity -- there are time constraints, after all --  <i>Minority Report </i>is rushing, rushing, rushing to its climax, while <i>War </i>takes the scenic route, which to my mind makes it all that much <b><u>more</u></b> unsettling.  We're watching the world end in an almost morbidly leisurely fashion.  Could be a commentary about our times, that, yeah?



<blockquote>I mean, it's not really a film where I'd like to go "Hey, let's watch War of the Worlds tonight so we can be thrilled." &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
Hell, I say <u><i><b>exactly</b></i></u> that.  Though I must say, I'm enforcing a "break" from watching this film -- when I began mistaking water towers for Little Brown Men and a Third in my subdivision, and trying to research what the Hell a solenoid does and laying in spares, and making sure I had more than bread and condiments in my pantry at all times, I think I'd taken my <i>War of the Worlds </i>fetish just a smidge too far.



<blockquote>P.S. For that new War of the Worlds steelbook DVD coming out, if there is a bonus feature of Tom making fun of Lord Xenu or Elrond Hubbard, then my opinions on War of the Worlds are automatically reversed.  &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Chuckling]  Deal.  
 
 
<b>Vive</b>:  

<blockquote>...[T]he initial invasion of the tripods? Holy crap, that had to have been one of the coldest, most intense movie-going experiences in my life. It wasn't like <i>ID4</i> where it felt like a blockbuster/cartoon. Those tripods were VICIOUS. It was great to see the Cruise's character as an everyday guy who had no chance whatsoever of saving the day. The 360-degree camera that whizzed in and out of the car when his family was fleeing the city was a great moment of fear and panic. So was the scene the rowdy crowd tried to steal Cruise's car. That's a side of humanity you rarely see on-screen, that we can be selfish, paranoid people when it comes to survival. And how ballsy was Spielberg by not going up over that hill to show the destructo-feast of copters vs. tripods? He kept it completely true to the POV of the film, that we would only see what Cruise's character saw. Of course, the ending (like so many of Stevie's) was out of left field, but at least it was true to the book and kept with the idea that human beings aren't as in control of the world as we think. Anyway, that's just my two cents. Sorry to digress from the October movies...  &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
  
That quote is so perfect, you've left me with nothing to say.  For once.  Excellent work, my friend.  Wait, I hear the Galactic Shift Whistle, time to get back to work.  Everybody up into the spider-thingy!


I remain, as always...  <b>[BWARM <i><u>BWAAAAARRRRRRRMMMMMMM</u></i>...] </b>

Nico.  (Duck!  It's a cement plant!)
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6051</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6051</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:53:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Alright just have two things to say Tim Burton sucks he destroys everything he touches and Kevin Smith is the shit.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6052</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6052</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:15:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ transformers2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6059</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6059</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 20:02:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>Man, you should have been in charge of the script, because that would have made the film much better, and the ending much better. &nbsp;
		</blockquote>
[Bowing]  You give me far, far too much credit.  You can't get much better than <b>Steven Spielberg</b>, <b>David Koepp </b>(<i>Carlito's Way</i>, <i>Panic Room</i>, <i>Spider-Man</i>), <b>Josh Friedman </b>(<i>The Black Dahlia</i>) and, of course, H.G. Wells (you name it).  Next to them, I am as a bug standing next to giants.  (Hmmm, familiar analogy, there...)  [Grin]


I remain, as always...


Nico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6063</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6063</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:03:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nicodemus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I wouldn't say that.  there wasn't a whole lot of genius in those movies.  Spiderman wasn't anything like it should've been.  Just like x-men.  I liked the x-men movies.  But could've been much better.  Especially if ice man and colossus were adults, and rogue of course.  Not too mention they haven't even hinted at gambit yet.WTF.  Anyways.  If you ask me what makes really good movies worth remembering.  A great imagination and willingness to make something they won't make a whole lot of money.  Just like Saw.  Most won't agree with me there.  But I really don't care.  No Offense.  But Panic Room and Spiderman doesn't really say much for those guys.  I liked both movies.  Panic Room was probably the only Foster movie I like.  Even after seeing the brave one.  BORING.  and Lame.  Anyways.  I don't mean to pump up your ego Nico but they have no more chances of being "giants" much less legends. Than you or I.  The next big Director/Producer/Writer is out there.  All they need is an idea and an opportunity.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6084</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6084</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:40:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cRAzY]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Which October Release are you most looking forward to?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <b><u>Bless you Michael Bay. Armageddon is a masterpiece.</u></b>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6105</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasymoguls.com/forum/posts/list/379.page#6105</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:30:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tuan69]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>