Fantasy Moguls Forum


To Woodcock or NOT to Woodcock, THAT is the question...  XML
Forum Index -> Movie Tracking and Buzz--Movers and Shakers Go to Page: 1, 2 Next 
Poll
Should I Woodcock?
Yes, you should Woodcock. 31% [ 5 ]
No, to Woodcock would be folly. 50% [ 8 ]
Woodcock, but not if you need an IMDB boost. 6% [ 1 ]
What would a woodcock c*ck if a woodcock could c*ck wood? 13% [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 16
Login or register to vote on this poll.
Author Message
Lovely
Art Director

Joined: Apr 1, 2007 7:48 AM
Messages: 301
Offline

What do you think? It could tank in a hurry...

haha, the forum wouldn't take the c-word
dranscht
Executive Producer

Joined: Mar 30, 2007 3:29 PM
Messages: 764
Offline

I'd only go for it in Box Office leagues.
Haasing1986
Script Researcher

Joined: Apr 26, 2007 2:49 PM
Messages: 72
Offline

I don't want to Woodcock. But I'm far behind in Box Office, and it only costs $3 in August-October Ultimate Leagues.

It probably will tank - but at that price my only other option is Sydney White.

Already have Good Luck Chuck
transformers2
Mogul

Joined: Apr 7, 2007 6:48 AM
Messages: 1354
Offline

Mr.Woodcock will tank bad there has been no ads for it it is destined to be a bomb.
Shryke42
Executive Producer

Joined: Mar 31, 2007 5:36 PM
Messages: 967
Offline

I've seen plenty of ads for it. More than I have for Good Luck Chuck, actually.
JackO
Mogul

Joined: Sep 4, 2007 7:14 PM
Messages: 1109
Offline

dranscht wrote:
I'd only go for it in Box Office leagues. 


What he said. I don't think the IMDB folks are going to be very nice to this one.
cRAzY
Mogul

Joined: May 2, 2007 10:02 AM
Messages: 1161
Offline

As long as it does better than the brave one I'll will be very pleased. Jodie Foster annoying anyone else. I caught in the paper the other day that she rented sin city and got pissed because she coudln't believe that people thought child molestation was funny. Other than Jackie Boy getting his head shoved in piss, what the Hell was funny about that movie. She needs to understand the difference between comic books and graphic novels. Either that or she should be executed for retardation coupled with failure to produce talent in her movies.
Lovely
Art Director

Joined: Apr 1, 2007 7:48 AM
Messages: 301
Offline

Haasing1986 wrote:
I don't want to Woodcock. But I'm far behind in Box Office, and it only costs $3 in August-October Ultimate Leagues.

It probably will tank - but at that price my only other option is Sydney White.

Already have Good Luck Chuck
 


Yeah, this is the problem...there doesn't appear to be any $3-5 movies with any real BO potential except Chuck and Woodcock. Perhaps the Comebacks, but that will probably tank greater than Woodcock.

I think its a conspiracy, really.

cRAzY
Mogul

Joined: May 2, 2007 10:02 AM
Messages: 1161
Offline

I think the comebacks is gonna be amazing. I think this is koechners first lead role and he looks likes he's got it nailed down. Will it beat Good Luck Chuck. Doubt it. But they're being released at two completely different times so you never know.
transformers2
Mogul

Joined: Apr 7, 2007 6:48 AM
Messages: 1354
Offline

I also think The Comebacks will be great it looks funny and David Kochner is great and it looks so much better than Mr.Woodcock.
StnMan5
Producer

Joined: Sep 12, 2007 2:29 PM
Messages: 591
Offline

First of all, The Comebacks is going to be absolutely terrible. It won't be funny at all, no matter how quasi-talented David Koechner has accidentally proven himself to be. And it'll be a huge surprise if it breaks $10 mill.

Second, I think Mr. Woodcock might actually prove to be pretty decent. It won't beat Good Luck Chuck at the Box Office, but it should do pretty well. I think the quality will be there as well. I predict it will be a pleasant surprise. Nothing spectacular, but should be decently entertaining.
Haasing1986
Script Researcher

Joined: Apr 26, 2007 2:49 PM
Messages: 72
Offline

From my 3 months experience of playing this game I have come to realise that the majority of movies tank. The studios seem to recoup their money on a hand-full of hits, DVD sales, and other collaterals.

At $3 and $5 respectively, I imagine that both Woodcock and the Comebacks will tank. However, in my August-October League, Mr. Woodcock will have 45 days to slowly accumulate box office, whereas The Comebacks will only have 11 days to pinch some pennies.

Both will have low IMDB scores, and I doubt either will score major PTA or Top 5 points. Hopefully the low Imdb scores will be offset by my filling my slate.


and Mr Woodcock is such a funny title *giggles*
dranscht
Executive Producer

Joined: Mar 30, 2007 3:29 PM
Messages: 764
Offline

I actually wouldn't be surprised at all if The Comebacks breaks $20 million.
JackO
Mogul

Joined: Sep 4, 2007 7:14 PM
Messages: 1109
Offline

dranscht wrote:
I actually wouldn't be surprised at all if The Comebacks breaks $20 million. 


I agree. I don't think it will be a great or even goodmovie by any means, but I think it will get a few tickets sold. Merely for their marketing campaign. My theater had this standee, who I assume is Stacy Kiebler hiking a football. I'm sure it will get a few from folks from the high school to college crowd.
tuan69
Mogul

Joined: Mar 30, 2007 10:27 PM
Messages: 1052
Offline

Everyone, I think we are about to witness a new point (low) in cinema history.

And that is...

There is something that is giving Epic Movie a run for it's money as the lowest and most spectacularly crapola movie in cinema's history in the past 3000 years.

And that is... The Comebacks.
 
Forum Index -> Movie Tracking and Buzz--Movers and Shakers Go to Page: 1, 2 Next 
Go to: