| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/forum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) Jul 11, 2007 1:10 PM
|
dranscht
Executive Producer
Joined: Mar 30, 2007 3:29 PM
Messages: 890
Offline
|
cRAzY wrote:
Anybody remember the south park espisode with speilberg and lucas. I think those guys were hinting at something. I really don't want to see every movie made before 2000 become a frickin remake.
Free Hat!
|
|
|
 |
Jul 11, 2007 7:03 PM
|
tuan69
Mogul
Joined: Mar 30, 2007 10:27 PM
Messages: 1052
Offline
|
I love Bay for the fact that he chose to cut 20% of his paycheck for Transformers so it could be used for the special effects.
How the hell did a turd like Spider-Man 3 cost $300M? I mean that Sandman was shitty-looking.d
|
|
|
|
Jul 11, 2007 7:04 PM
|
tuan69
Mogul
Joined: Mar 30, 2007 10:27 PM
Messages: 1052
Offline
|
I love Bay for the fact that he chose to cut 20% of his paycheck for Transformers so it could be used for the special effects.
How the hell did a turd like Spider-Man 3 cost $300M? I mean that Sandman was shitty-looking.
|
|
|
|
Jul 12, 2007 6:30 AM
|
iamhollywood
Producer
Joined: Jun 13, 2007 12:14 PM
Messages: 575
Offline
|
How the hell did a turd like Spider-Man 3 cost $300M? I mean that Sandman was shitty-looking.
The cost of sand is going up these days...
|
|
|
|
Jul 12, 2007 7:32 AM
|
numbersix_99
Mogul
Joined: Mar 31, 2007 3:52 AM
Messages: 1582
Offline
|
Spiderman 3 cost 300 million because Sam Raimi was getting Thai massages, manicures, and eating banquets. At least, he must have being doing all that, because he sure as hell wasn't directing!
|
|
|
|
Jul 12, 2007 2:52 PM
|
cRAzY
Mogul
Joined: May 2, 2007 10:02 AM
Messages: 1161
Offline
|
Thats great. Long live Starscream. I mean Transformers. Seriously though. Long live starscream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[Search]](/forum/templates/default/images/icon_mini_search.gif){kind=icon}
![[Recent Topics]](/forum/templates/default/images/icon_mini_recentTopics.gif){kind=icon}
![[Up]](/forum/templates/default/images/icon_up.gif){kind=icon}